The price of the Jaguar XF has always been punchy, going head-to-head with German rivals rather than trying to sneak sales by pricing slightly more cheaply.

That's a reflection of the fact that Jaguar - and its customers -  believe the XF is a product worthy of taking on the others at their own game. In like-for-like spec, sometimes it is even more expensive than the alternatives.

Matt Saunders Autocar

Matt Saunders

Road test editor
Audi and BMW may offer cheaper running costs for company car tax buyers

Despite returning impressive real-world economy, the Jaguar XF equipped with either 2.2-litre engine emits marginally higher levels of CO2 than the automatic BMW 520d and Audi A6 2.0 TDI. That means the taxation costs are accordingly higher - and that Jaguar XF buyers facing company car tax must be wary of.

The 3.0-litre V6 diesels perform wellthe low-powered model matches the BMW 530d, while the S emits only slightly more than the 535d and Audi A6 3.0 TDI.

The 3.0 V6 petrol only makes financial sense for buyers covering low miles, and even then the steep depreciation should ensure they weigh up the diesel alternatives carefully.

The Jaguar XFR, meanwhile, should never be bought by antyone who needs to keep an eye on running costs.

Find an Autocar car review

Jaguars have performed remarkably well in customer satisfaction surveys of late, meaning buyers can ignore some of the more historic tales of customer dissatisfaction.

Meanwhile, servicing, insurance and depreciation costs should prove competitive for the class.

 

 

Save money on your car insurance

Compare quotesCompare insurance quotes

Find an Autocar car review