From £21,1057

The French brand's budget SUV is more value than cheap and can be had with seven seats

Europe’s modal average, typical new car has, for several years now almost certainly been a supermini-based, B-segment SUV. Given the soaring popularity of the likes of the Ford Puma, Nissan Juke, Vauxhall Mokka, Renault Captur and more, it’s remarkable enough that there are any ‘firsts’ left to accomplish in the class. And yet Citroën is laying claim to one with the second-generation Citroen C3 Aircross.

This new, higher-riding, marginally tougher-looking, stretched version of the Citroen C3 supermini is the first car in its segment – a pumped-up supermini segment, let’s not forget – to offer seven seats. It doesn’t do so as standard and yet, still, it becomes a fairly unique prospect among new cars: one to combine a footprint that’s narrowly under 4.4 metres in length with three rows of seating for those who have a use for them.

Stellantis's various brands continue to give mixed messages about this 48v hybrid system. Some call it Hybrid 145, others - like Citroen, here - Hybrid 136. But the fact is, it produces maximum 'system output' of 144bhp - or 145ps - when both petrol engine and electric motor are on point. So quite why Citroen feels the need to 'low ball' its output - when Fiat, Vauxhall and Jeep certainly don't - is open to question.

The usual Tardis-like analogies are clearly invited. Seven seats in cars of comparable length, such as the Dacia Jogger, are offered elsewhere, but none among cars identified less as MPVs and more as pint-sized SUVs. Now for the Autocar road test tape measure to bear witness to how much usable space there really is in this car,  and whether it’s a packaging marvel, an exercise in futility – or something in between.

Advertisement
Back to top

Like the smaller C3, it can be had as an electric ë-C3 Aircross; as a conventional turbocharged petrol; or as a 48V ‘self-charging’ petrol-electric hybrid. It was the last version we elected to test.

DESIGN & STYLING

7
Citroen C3 Airocross review 2025 02 side panning

The material differences between the regular C3 and this C3 Aircross are quite subtle but certainly aren’t just window dressing. Just as the 2017 first-generation car was to its equivalent C3, this is apparently a very close relation – much closer, say, than a Peugeot 2008 ever has been to a 208. The cars clearly share plenty of body panels, no doubt much of their body-in-white unitary steel chassis and a lot of interior parts.

But compare them in profile and you can spot the differences easily enough. The Aircross is 380mm longer than the regular C3, with a 132mm-longer wheelbase. The rest of the growth spurt is contained within a stretched rear overhang. The longer rear doors betray that difference, as does the car’s stretched C-pillar, while its more upright rear window speaks of increased boot volume. Elsewhere, however, it’s mostly only bumper and styling that sets the C3 and Aircross apart, which tells you a great deal about how much SUV-typical visual attitude is contained in the regular C3.

Citroën returned to an oval brand logo in 2022. When you see one on a grille – in chrome, with those horizontal lines creating extra visual interest on the brightwork – you better appreciate how the firm is gesturing at its century of history.

Like its smaller relation, the C3 Aircross is based on Stellantis’s new Smart Car platform that supports both battery-electric and combustion-engined derivatives. In the C3 Aircross’s case, EV versions can be had with a slightly longer-range battery than the regular C3 gets (54kWh versus 44kWh), or in standard-range form. And if electric power doesn’t suit, there are 99bhp 1.2-litre turbo petrol and 144bhp 1.2-litre, 48V hybrid options as well: the former with a six-speed manual gearbox, the latter with a six-speed dual-clutch automatic.

All versions have driven front wheels, a strut-type front axle and a torsion beam rear. Steel coil springs are used for primary suspension, with Citroën continuing to fit hydraulic bump stops, designed to add progressive wheel control towards the limits of travel, to enable the fitment of softer springs.

Our hybrid test car weighed 1381kg on the proving ground scales with a third of a tank of fuel on board: quite a respectably light figure, given its capability and brief and at least some electrification.

INTERIOR

8
Citroen C3 Airocross review 2025 10 dash

The C3 Aircross’s practicality calling card may well be those optional third-row chairs, but customers should be careful to consider what kind of practicality they actually need before hastily adding them.

Our Hybrid 136 test car had them, and they fold flat into a space roughly the size of what might otherwise be an under-floor boot compartment. But folding them down leaves a boot of only 300 litres up to the window line, reduced from 460 litres in the case of the equivalent five-seater car – so a significant trade-off. In terms of volume, that’s actually less under-shelf cargo space than most regular superminis offer (although the Aircross’s boxy upper body would be likely to reverse that relationship for outright, loaded-to-the-roof capacity).

The digital instruments are billed as a pseudo-head-up display. The screen is a bit too small to carry all the info you would like all at once, but it couldn’t get much nearer your natural line of sight - other than by being an actual 'HUD'.

There are other compromises in the boot of the seven-seater. Citroën provides only a fairly flimsy covering for the folded third row to serve as a kind of boot floor, which clips onto the second-row seatbacks – but wouldn’t stop smaller items from rolling around and beneath it into hard-to-reach areas. There are also wide steel loop fixings that the third-row seatbacks connect to when in place, which when the seats are down would reduce the boot’s maximum loading width to less than 900mm. When all seven seats are in place, almost no boot space is left. Citroën claims 40 litres, but it’s really only enough to store that flimsy boot floor covering.

How usable is what you’re getting in return: the third row of seats? To be fair to Citroën, the seats themselves offer no less space than many typical smaller seven-seaters – enough for smaller children on booster seats (typically for these cars, there are no Isofix points for row three), but not really for those of secondary school age. Anyone back there has only limited foot space – but there are proper cupholders and a USB-C wired charging port. The rear-most side windows are puny, so it also feels slightly claustrophobic. 

Row two is roughly class-typical (the Dacia Duster and Renault 4 offer slightly less leg room but more head room), but the five-seat Aircross’s second-row chairs are mounted 65mm farther to the rear (there are no sliding seats here, except in the front), meaning more leg room, and they also recline, improving head room. This car is therefore ready to cater to those who want a spacious five-seater with a bigger boot, or a less-spacious-feeling seven-seater with a smaller boot. Even in the seven-seater, the most commonly used passenger seats should feel adequately roomy for average-sized adults.

Behind the wheel, you’re greeted by the same upwards-projected, head-up-display-style digital instruments as the regular C3 uses. It’s a touch sparse for useful information – there’s no rev counter at all – but very readable. Although the layout of secondary controls is likewise simplified, Citroën takes care to include physical blower controls (which we like), as well as physical buttons for the deactivation of the car’s key advanced driver assistance systems (speeding warning buzzer, lane keeping assistance).

The car’s 10.3in infotainment system is quite a basic one (wider adjustment of what ADAS features the Aircross has is done through the steering wheel controls and trip computer), but it’s not over-burdened with functions to manage. It is easy to navigate and includes wireless smartphone mirroring, which is what you are likely to use most of the time.

The car’s driving position, meanwhile, feels only slightly raised, but offers good visibility. The front seats are a little bit flat and lacking in lateral support, but are fairly softly padded.

Where material quality is concerned, the cabin is made mostly of hard mouldings that don’t appeal much to the touch but aren’t shiny and don’t mark easily either, so aren’t especially offensive. Textile trims are used in a few places to add a richer note, and fairly effectively.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

7
Citroen C3 Airocross review 2025 24 engine bay

Citroën’s 48V petrol-electric powertrain made our Hybrid 136 test car the fastest-accelerating C3 Aircross you can buy. Even so, the car doesn’t feel particularly enthused by the prospect of getting a hurry on, which tells you a lot about the appealingly laid- back dynamic priorities of the Citroën brand in 2025.

Objectively, it’s at least passably assertive, without feeling brisk. Needing 9.3sec to hit 60mph from rest on a wet test day, and 9.9sec to get to 62mph, it was actually slightly quicker than Citroën’s 10.1sec claim and slightly quicker, too, than the Dacia Duster Hybrid 140 we tested in 2024; although it was marginally slower than the Toyota Yaris Hybrid we timed back in 2020.

Under full power, a combination of the three-cylinder turbo engine and electric drive motor allows the car to tackle motorway slip roads and single-carriageway overtakes at least fairly keenly, but there isn’t much of a sense of readily accessible electrified torque here, or any particular potency held in reserve. The electric motor feels quite meek - so that making the car run in engine-off condition, though possible in town and heavy traffic, requires quite a lot of restraint with your big toe, and the engine revs busily and works hard when you make greater demands. The net impression is of a powertrain that works respectably well but is seldom as assured or effortless as would best serve Citroën’s character type, and is seldom quite as efficient as you might expect it to be, either (see ‘Buying & Owning’, right).

The car offers normal ‘D’ and ‘L’ modes for the transmission – ‘L’ increasing trailing-throttle engine braking (motor regen, in the Hybrid 136’s case), but not by a great deal as far as we could tell. Since the hybrid system is a P2-style configuration with the motor upstream of the gearbox, regen tends to ebb and flow a little with every downshift, and feels a bit uneven as a result, although that doesn’t really amount to a drivability issue.

There is no way to select gears manually when the engine is running; this is very much a powertrain to leave to its own devices, intended for those who wouldn’t take an interest in what it was doing at any particular moment. And it works – perhaps not especially well, but certainly well enough.

The 99bhp manual version is good for a 10.6sec run to 62mph, but feels a bit gutless during in-gear acceleration thanks to a lack of torque. When loaded up with people, frequent gear changes will be required to keep momentum on hills, so it's a shame the 1.2-litre becomes noisy and strained when revved and that little pleasure can be derived from the vague gearbox and odd-shaped lever. 

Undoubtedly the worst thing about the manual, however, is that it does away with a rev counter. If you're used to driving a manual this won't be a problem, but if you're not it will be difficult to judge changes smoothly, or even set off. 

RIDE & HANDLING

7
Citroen C3 Airocross review 2025 25 front cornering

Citroën’s particular approach to the chassis tuning of its modern models, with their Advanced Comfort Suspension (read hydraulic bump stops), has produced slightly mixed results of late as regards suitability for UK roads. It does so again in the case of the C3 Aircross.

This is certainly a comfortable-riding car for a significant proportion of the time, and deals with well-surfaced urban and extra-urban roads quite well; even if it’s a bit of a fallacy to suggest, as Citroën does, that it’s much like a ‘magic carpet’ on gnarlier roads.

The car has lightly weighted, fairly slow-geared steering; a fairly high, though ultimately controlled, rate of roll as it corners; a modest, though not precarious, mechanical grip level; and a medium-soft gait to its ride that makes it supple over longer-wave inputs. On a road that suits it, it bobs along very comfortably and agreeably. It’s also the kind of car you can manoeuvre around car parks and junctions with barely more than a fingertip’s grasp on the steering wheel, which contributes quite a lot to how easy it feels to drive at low speeds.

At higher speeds, however, that lightness in the steering begins to make the car’s handling feel quite flighty and over-assisted as you turn into a corner, eroding your confidence in it slightly. Citroën’s gently sprung suspension, meanwhile, doesn’t exactly fail to keep control of the car’s body, although damping of bigger inputs can feel a bit ineffective. But it certainly struggles with ride isolation and wheel control. There’s a hollowness about the C3 Aircross’s secondary ride, over ridges and drains, that could lead you to expect that the car uses bigger alloy wheels and skinnier tyre sidewalls than it actually does. 

That, in turn, suggests Citroën’s clever bump stops don’t work as well on this low-cost Smart Car platform as they might elsewhere, and that there’s more tuning work to do if the firm wants to deliver a distinguishing sort of ride comfort on cars that use it.

The electric e-C3 Aircross rides slightly better; its weight helps settle the suspension more frequently. 

Assisted Driving - 3 stars

All versions of the C3 Aircross come with lane departure warning, autonomous emergency braking, driver monitoring and speed limit ‘recognition and recommendation’ systems as standard. None gets adaptive or intelligent cruise control, just the manual kind.

The car’s AEB and driver monitoring systems seemed well tuned and not overly sensitive. But, while there are physical buttons to deactivate the lane keeping and speed limit monitoring systems (which we appreciate), the latter irked us when left on. It clearly hadn’t been properly converted for the UK market, so would recognise a posted 50mph limit as it if were 50kph, and then start beeping at 31mph.

This was only a software glitch, and may well have been a quirk of the early demo car we tested, so might not affect customer cars subject to a proper UK-market inspection before handover. But that is, of course, impossible to be sure about –  although the manual we tested didn't behave the same way.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

8
Citroen C3 Airocross review 2025 01 front cornering

There’s plenty of value for money where the C3 Aircross’s pricing is concerned. Buyers motivated by that will perhaps only pause to wonder which version of the car would suit them best, and whether they really need to spend more than they otherwise might.

Though it’s still beaten by a Dacia Jogger on bargain seven-seat showroom price, the C3 Aircross is cheaper than the majority of its B-SUV competitors, and especially so if you stick with the cheaper engines and entry-grade trim level. The caveat here is that, if you want the seven-seat version, you have to start with Max trim, which is just another reason to be certain that you really need those extra seats, and are happy with all the compromises they bring.

As far as powertrain choice goes, the Hybrid 136 model looks like the outlier on price now that government incentives have made the ë-C3 Aircross that much more tempting. But even the hybrid costs almost £1000 less than the equivalent Toyota Yaris Cross,  and after Toyota’s latest retail discounts at that.

Fuel economy for our Hybrid 136 test car proved quietly impressive around town (‘everyday’ test: 54.3mpg) but a little disappointing out of town (touring test: 41.5mpg). On both, it bettered the results of a Dacia Duster Hybrid 140, but we expect slightly better of a car of this size optimised for efficiency in 2025.

In a shorter test with the manual non-hybrid version, we saw the reverse in terms of efficiency, with 50+mpg within reach on open roads, and mpg in the low 40s at lower speeds. If you're more likely to use your C3 Aircross for longer trips, it seems the manual would make more sense. 

VERDICT

7
Citroen C3 Airocross review 2025 28 static

While clever enough to admit seven people,  and likeable for its alternative character traits,  the Citroën C3 Aircross isn’t quite as versatile as you would imagine. It could handle a larger, young family, or a smaller, older one. But it couldn’t switch from one role to the other quite as casually as perhaps it should, so ordering the version you really need is key.

As a higher-end hybrid seven-seater, the car has adequate performance and easy drivability, although it leaves a little to be desired in terms of refinement and real-world touring efficiency. We would stick with a five-seat, entry-level petrol model to snag this car at its voluminous, value-packed, simplicity-centred best, and credit Citroën for its boldness of spirit, a little more than its particular execution.

If Dacia can manage removable second-row seats on the Jogger, couldn’t Citroën have put a removable third row in this car? Put them in when you need them; leave them in the garage, and use the bigger boot, when you don’t.

Alex Wolstenholme

Alex Wolstenholme
Title: Editorial Assistant

Alex joined Haymarket, the publisher of Autocar, in 2023. A car fanatic, he loves to delve into the spec-sheet, especially when it concerns something obscure or quirky. He currently drives a 2007 Alpina D3 estate but is often seen in his mum's Ford Fiesta (much to her annoyance). 

In his current position, as an editorial assistant, Alex mainly assists in managing Autocar's presence on MSN, but also writes features for the magazine.

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.