What is it?
When Kia signed off the third-generation Ceed, we’re told it spent a further six months fettling the suspension of the range-topping GT specifically for European roads.
For a car designed in Frankfurt, manufactured in Slovakia and tested at a little-known circuit called the Nürburgring, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. And yet because the project was overseen by Albert Biermann – formerly head of BMW M, now chief engineer at Kia’s parent company Hyundai and therefore the man behind the excellent i30 N – neither can one so easily dismiss such a claim as marketing hot air.
The Ceed GT predates the i30 N, of course, and so has some history. Good history. Introduced in the 2015 as the Procee'd GT, Kia’s first go at a driver’s hatch wasn’t what you’d call quick, and yet with a 7.7sec 0-62mph time, neither was it slow. Similarly, while the front-driven chassis never felt as sharp as that of even a Golf GTI, it was a very long way from feeling blunt. Kia stuck to the line that, rather than being a sabre-toothed road-racer, this was a hatchback with more easy-going ‘grand touring’ pretensions, and only a faintly brittle ride undermined that. It felt honest, handled pleasingly, was comfortable even over long distances, and we liked it.
For 2019 the philosophy hasn’t changed, to the extent that this second attempt at a GT-grade Ceed might at first seem to move the game on not at all. You still get a turbocharged 1.6-litre four-cylinder engine making an identical 201bhp at 6000rpm and 195lb ft of torque, which now, in fairness, arrives a smidge earlier at 1500rpm.
Join the debate
artill
If you want a Ceed, i am sure
If you want a Ceed, i am sure this is the nicest version. If you arent determined to have a Ceed, i cant see this drawing anyone in to the showroom.
FM8
artill wrote:
Well, KIA/Hyundia have managed to decimate sales for the established brands in Europe over the past 10 years or so. Plenty of customers have found what they were looking for in their showrooms without models like this being available for that long. This will only continue adding to their decline.
Peter Cavellini
Nice to look at, but...
Such a shame really, nothing radical ,not even that quick....
Peter Cavellini.
FM8
Peter Cavellini wrote:
But that's Kia/Hyundia's USP. More of the same, just better value.
AutoConception.com
Job's a good'un
It looks better than a Mercedes A Class and could even be mistaken for a Golf from a distance. As volume hatchbacks go, in styling terms, this is up there. Good effort from the Kia design team.
si73
Not sure I can see it being
Not sure I can see it being mistaken for a golf, focus maybe? Seems ridiculous that 201 bhp and sub 8 seconds 0-62 isn't enough for the term hot hatch, how much power do you need or can you use on the road? I am sure this is plenty fast enough. Whilst it doesnt seem to be the ultimate in driver involvement the review reads like it fulfills its gt brief rather successfully.
catnip
I like the look of this
I like the look of this inside and out. The interior appeals to me, with not too much obsession with touchscreens, and if you have to have one it should be mounted high like this one, for driver safety. Its not as good as a Golf interior, of course, but then what is?
typos1
catnip wrote:
Pretty much any interior is better than the boring Golf's. I agree with your comment about the high up touch screen, the Golf's is lower down, so surely youd prefer the Kia's interior to the Golf's ?
XXXX just went POP.
catnip
typos1 wrote:
Sorry, I was actually being a bit sarcastic. I much prefer the Kia's interior, and I really don't know why the motoring press continue to hold VW's interiors in such high esteem.
The Apprentice
Nearly 20 years ago I was
Nearly 20 years ago I was buzzing around in a Volvo V40 T4 with 200bhp, a 0-60 of about 7 and a bit seconds, not much changes really.Although back then the T4 was considered a properly quick car. These days it would be just 'warm'
Pages
Add your comment